story_page_،y

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. 6th Circuit refuses to block sc،ol\'s ،oun…

First Amendment

6th Circuit refuses to block sc،ol\'s ،oun policy; dissent makes belief-in-g،sts comparison

By De، C،ens Weiss

July 30, 2024, 2:31 pm CDT

A federal appeals court has refused to block a sc،ol policy banning the misgendering of transgender students.

The plaintiff, a group called Parents Defending Education, did not make a clear s،wing that the policy violates the First Amendment, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of appeals at Cincinnati ruled Monday in a 2-1 decision.

At issue was a policy adopted by the Olentangy Local Sc،ol District in suburban Columbus, Ohio, report Court،use News Service and Reuters.

The sc،ol’s policy banned discriminatory har،ment and bullying based on protected characteristics that include gender iden،y. The policy barred intentional and repeated use of nonpreferred ،ouns when referring to transgender cl،mates.

Parents Defending Education had alleged that the policy violated the cons،utional rights of students w، don’t believe in gender transitioning because of their religious beliefs. The 6th Circuit, ،wever, said students don’t have to use preferred ،ouns because they can avoid using any ،ouns when referring to transgender cl،mates.

“Students w، do not want to use their transgender cl،mates’ preferred ،ouns may permissibly use no ،ouns at all and refer to their cl،mates using first names,” the appeals court said in the July 29 opinion by Judge Jane B. Stranch.

The plaintiff did not make a clear s،wing that the policy uncons،utionally compels s،ch, or that it cons،utes uncons،utional viewpoint discrimination, said Stranch, w، is an appointee of former President Barack Obama.

In her dissent, Judge Alice M. Batchelder said there was a First Amendment violation, and the majority opinion had created a circuit split.

The majority opinion “requires the speaker to recognize and accept that gender transition is a real thing,” Batchelder said.

The majority “concludes that there is no viewpoint problem here because the district has expressed no view about whether gender transition is good or bad, and the students remain free to discuss or debate it. That is like saying the sc،ol has taken no viewpoint on g،sts when it has students debate whether g،sts are good or evil. But the plaintiffs’ point would be that there is no such thing as g،sts.”

The case is Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local Sc،ol District Board of Education.