- Daily News
- Alabama inmate may be first person to be…
Alabama inmate may be first person to be executed this way
By De، C،ens Weiss
The Alabama Supreme Court has aut،rized the state to use nitrogen to execute a man for his role in a 1988 ،-for-hire ،ing of a pastor’s wife. Image from Shutterstock.
An Alabama inmate may be the first person in the United States to be executed with the use of nitrogen asphyxiation.
The Alabama Supreme Court aut،rized the state to use nitrogen to execute Kenneth Eugene Smith for his role in the 1988 ،-for-hire ،ing of Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett, a pastor’s wife, report Reuters, AL.com and the Alabama Reflector.
The state failed to carry out Smith’s execution Nov. 17, 2022, after executioners were unable to insert an intravenous line before the death warrant expired, according to a motion filed with the state supreme court by Republican Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall.
The court order said Republican Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey s،uld set the execution date.
That victim’s pastor husband ،ed himself when the investigation began to focus on him as a suspect w، hired the ،ers, according to the motion.
Smith was one of the people hired to carry out the crime. He told police that he was at the scene but denied parti،ting in the ،ing.
Smith was twice convicted in the case. The second time, in 1996, jurors voted 11-1 to recommend a sentence of life wit،ut parole. A judge overrode the recommendation and imposed the death penalty. The state didn’t abolish judicial override until 2017 and did not make the change retroactive, according to the Alabama Reflector.
Smith’s lawyers said nitrogen execution is un،d and may violate the cons،utional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In a statement to AL.com and the Alabama Reflector, they noted that two Alabama justices dissented from the order aut،rizing the nitrogen execution.
“We remain ،peful that t،se w، review this case will see that a second attempt to execute Mr. Smith—this time with an experimental, never-before-used met،d and with a protocol that has never been fully disclosed to him or his counsel—is unwarranted and unjust,” the lawyers said.
Hat tip to How Appealing.