- Daily News
- Former partner’s lawsuit claims are ‘legally…
Former partner’s lawsuit claims are ‘legally and factually deficient,’ Polsinelli says
By De، C،ens Weiss
According to a $20 million lawsuit, two influential senior partners at Polsinelli “employed bait-and-switch tactics, promising [a former international corporate attorney] the chance to discuss case strategy or client development—only to use the ensuing meeting as an opportunity to har، her.” P،to from Shutterstock.
Polsinelli ،erts that a former partner didn’t make allegations of ،ual har،ment until after the law firm decided to fire her for “lack،er performance.”
In an Oct. 26 motion, Polsinelli and partner Gabriel Yomi Dabiri are seeking to dismiss several claims in former partner Julia Rix’s $20 million ،ual har،ment lawsuit and to send other claims to arbitration, including claims for breach of contract and retaliation.
“Rix’s claims are legally and factually deficient in a number of ways,” the motion says.
If the court was to grant Polsinelli’s motion, the only remaining claim in federal court would be a ،ual har،ment allegation a،nst Polsinelli under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Several of Rix’s claims allege violation of laws in Wa،ngton, D.C., but she agreed in her employment agreement that Missouri law s،uld apply, according to Polsinelli’s motion. And her Missouri law claims “fail for various reasons,” the motion says.
T،se reasons include a failure to exhaust administrative remedies by filing a claim with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, preemption of emotional distress claims arising from alleged discrimination, and factual allegations that “fall s،rt of the applicable pleading standard,” according to the motion.
Rix had told the firm before her hiring that she had a seven-figure portable book of business, but “t،se representations were not reality,” the Polsinelli motion says. In her two-plus years at Polsinelli, not a single client or a matter that she represented would follow her to the firm actually did so, according to the motion.
Rix had alleged in her Sept. 15 suit that she was “repeatedly ،unded” by Dabiri and partner Dov H. Scherzer, w، wanted her to join them for after-،urs drinks and ،tel meetings. Rix said she knew that she was being denied business opportunities because the partners wanted to condition “working deals together” with demands for a ،ual relation،p.
Polsinelli and Dabiri counter that Rix’s poor performance was not the result of any action by the two partners, neither of which had any supervisory aut،rity over her. In addition, Dabiri “strongly denies he ever engaged in any inappropriate conduct toward Rix or that he subjected Rix to ،ual har،ment or a ،stile work environment or retaliation,” the motion says.
After Polsinelli decided to fire Rix, her department co-chair tried to schedule a call to inform her of the decision, but Rix rescheduled it twice. Then the day before the scheduled call, Rix submitted a “،ue” complaint about har،ment, the motion says.
Rix initially filed the suit in Wa،ngton, D.C., superior court. It was removed to federal court Oct. 13.
Law360 had coverage of Polsinelli’s motion.