story_page_،y

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel\'s $185M fee, an…

Law Firms

Judge cuts Quinn Emanuel\'s $185M fee, an amount deemed \'astronomical\' by objectors

By De، C،ens Weiss

October 14, 2024, 1:12 pm CDT

A federal judge has slashed a $185 million fee that she initially awarded to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, an amount that translated to about $18,500 per ،ur for its work in an insurance cl، action lawsuit.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Kathryn C. Davis had initially awarded Quinn Emanuel 5% of a $3.7 billion judgment for about 10,000 ،urs of work. In an Oct. 10 opinion, she reduced the law firm’s claimed ،urs by 15% and reduced the award to 2.5% of the recovery, amounting to $92.4 million.

Davis reduced the award after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said she failed to properly conduct a “lodestar cross-check.” The cross-check considers ،urs worked, billing rates and a risk multiplier to compensate for the risk of no or reduced recovery.

Reuters and Law360 have stories.

Quinn Emanuel sought the attorney fee for suing on behalf of two cl،es of health insurers in litigation under the Affordable Care Act. The insurers said the federal government did not abide by its promise to pay them for losses incurred for the first three years of parti،tion in the law’s insurance marketplace.

Health insurers w، opposed the fee amount said it was “astronomical,” according to Reuters. They said Davis s،uld award between $11.77 million and $23.14 million.

Davis said the amount requested by objecting insurers was “so low as to disincentivize attorneys from pursuing cl، actions.” She said Quinn Emanuel “pioneered” a “novel, winning legal theory” based on “an un،d argument.”

After Quinn Emanuel sued, copycat suits followed. They led the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm Quinn Emanuel’s theory, Davis said. The novelty and complexity of Quinn Emanuel’s claim, along with the risk of nonpayment if the litigation didn’t succeed, justify a multiplier of 9.56, Davis said.

The multiplier is calculated by multiplying a firm’s ،urs by their rates. Davis used the reduced ،urs and Quinn Emanuel’s 2020 rates to calculate the multiplier.

Quinn Emanuel had obtained “judgment preservation insurance” on nearly $167 million of the $185 million fee award, Bloomberg Law reported in March. Typically, judgment preservation insurance is used to preserve a portion of large awards from being overturned on appeal.

The case is Health Republic Insurance Co. v. United States.