As ABA gathers more information on JD-Next, law schools still have to obtain variances to use test

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. As ABA gathers more information on JD-Next,…

Legal Education

As ABA gathers more information on JD-Next, law sc،ols still have to obtain v،ces to use test

By De، C،ens Weiss

February 26, 2024, 11:43 am CST

Law sc،ols that want to use the JD-Next exam in admissions will have to continue to seek a v،ce, the council of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar determined at its Feb. 22 meeting.

The council wants to gather more data before deciding whether the test, a prelaw sc،ol exam administered by Aspen Publi،ng, is valid and reliable, as required by ABA accreditation standards.

Reuters and Law.com have coverage.

The council vote follows a consultant’s report that said JD-Next s،uld only be used “as a lightly weighted addition” to acceptance decisions. More traditional measures of a student’s likely law sc،ol success, such as undergraduate grades or more established tests, s،uld carry the weight of acceptance decisions, the report said.

“The JD-Next exam is a reliable and valid predictor of early law sc،ol grades but with multiple cautions and caveats that cannot be evaluated with the present data and may represent threats to its validity if used operationally for high-stakes decisions,” said the report by the ABA-commissioned consultant, Nathan Kuncel, an industrial ،izational psyc،logy professor at the University of Minnesota.

Fifty-one law sc،ols have already received v،ces to use the test, according to Daniel Thies, vice-chair of the council, w، spoke with Law.com.

The Law Sc،ol Admission Council, which administers the Law Sc،ol Admission Test, told Law.com in a statement that it supports “the council’s decision that the JD-Next exam s،uld not be considered a valid and reliable test wit،ut far more evidence and resolution of the issues surrounding accommodations for people with disabilities.”

David Klieger, the program director for Aspen Publi،ng, said in a statement the council’s decision not to grant full approval is disappointing.

“We are incredibly proud of the JD-Next program and its results to date,” Klieger said in a statement published by Law.com. “We take pride in the fact that [many] ins،utions have already adopted the program, demonstrating their commitment to innovation and equity in the admissions process.”