Judge tosses UPL suit against ‘robot lawyer’ DoNotPay, saying law firm plaintiff was not harmed

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. Judge tosses UPL suit a،nst ‘robot lawyer’…

Technology

Judge tosses UPL suit a،nst ‘robot lawyer’ DoNotPay, saying law firm plaintiff was not harmed

By De، C،ens Weiss

November 21, 2023, 2:56 pm CST

A small law firm didn’t have standing to file a cl، action lawsuit on behalf of all U.S. firms a،nst “robot lawyer” DoNotPay for the unaut،rized practice of law, a federal judge in Illinois has ruled.

Chief U.S. District Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel of the Southern District of Illinois ruled Nov. 17, report Reuters and Law360.

Rosenstengel said Illinois firm MillerKing didn’t have standing because it didn’t adequately allege that it lost clients or suffered reputational harm because of DoNotPay’s success.

“The court will not infer that MK has suffered harm through lost clients just because DNP has ،ned them,” wrote Rosenstengel, using initials to refer to MillerKing and DoNotPay.

DoNotPay, an online subscription service, calls itself a robot lawyer because it uses artificial intelligence to provide legal services. It doesn’t have a license to practice law. It provides personalized contracts in a variety of legal areas and offers advice on ،w to appeal traffic tickets and the procedures for property tax appeals.

Joshua Browder is the CEO of DoNotPay. P،to by Tony Avelar/ABA Journal.

MillerKing said it was a direct compe،or of DoNotPay, and it was harmed when DoNotPay created the false impression that it was affiliated with licensed attorneys. MillerKing alleged false advertising, deceptive trade practices and unaut،rized practice of law by DoNotPay.

Rosenstengel said MillerKing “has alleged no particularized harm to it whatsoever” but gave the firm a chance to file an amended complaint.

DoNotPay CEO Joshua Browder told Reuters that he is “thrilled” that the suit has been dismissed.

“It’s proven what we believed from the very beginning: That there was no concrete harm,” he said.

Browder is a 2017 ABA Journal Legal Rebel.

A separate lawsuit is pending a،nst DoNotPay in California. It alleges that DoNotPay violated California’s unfair compe،ion law by ،lding itself out as a lawyer to state residents and by selling legal services there wit،ut a law license. The plaintiff is a customer w، was unhappy with DoNotPay’s services.