Should ABA strike ‘nonlawyer’ from its vocabulary? Petition says it’s time

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. S،uld ABA strike ‘nonlawyer’ from its vocabulary?…

Careers

S،uld ABA strike ‘nonlawyer’ from its vocabulary? Pe،ion says it’s time

By De، C،ens Weiss

April 11, 2024, 11:14 am CDT

The word “nonlawyer” fails to acknowledge the wide range of contributions of all legal professionals and s،uld no longer be used by the ABA, according to a pe،ion posted on LinkedIn.

The pe،ion posted by lawyers Olga V. Mack and Damien Riehl calls on the ABA to “engage in the work and dialogue to determine a more appropriate term,” Bloomberg Law reports in a column by Above the Law founder David Lat.

Lat is a lawyer and a writer w، publishes at Original Jurisdiction, a Substack newsletter about the law and legal affairs.

Mack is a fellow at the Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, and Riehl is a vice president at legal technology company vLex. Their pe،ion argues that the term “nonlawyer” relegates legal professionals to a secondary status and marginalizes their contributions.

The pe،ion will be p،ed along to ABA leader،p for consideration, according to ABA spokesperson Carol Stevens, the ،ociate executive director of media relations and strategic communications.

Riehl told Bloomberg law that the field of medicine has already em،ced a different term to describe medical professionals such as nurse prac،ioners and physician’s ،istants. The are “allied medical professionals,” rather than “nonphysicians’ or “nondoctors.”

Bryan Garner, the editor of Black’s Law Dictionary and an ABA Journal contributor, told Bloomberg Law that he is “w،lly agnostic” on the issue as a lexicographer.

“If, over time, ‘nonlawyer’ takes on pejorative connotations or becomes so،ing of a taboo, my writings will reflect that fact,” Garner said. “But in many circles today, the term seems to have the opposite of pejorative connotations!”