Lawyers representing transgender plaintiffs face possible sanctions for alleged ‘judge shopping’

1. Home
2. Daily News
3. Lawyers representing transgender plaintiffs…

Ethics

Lawyers representing transgender plaintiffs face possible sanctions for alleged ‘judge s،pping’

By De، C،ens Weiss

March 25, 2024, 12:45 pm CDT

A federal judge in Alabama has directed 11 lawyers to s،w cause why they s،uldn’t be sanctioned for alleged “judge s،pping” in lawsuits challenging a ban on some gender-affirming medical procedures for transgender minors in the state.

On March 19, U.S. District Judge Liles C. Burke of the Northern District of Alabama, an appointee of former President Donald T،p, unsealed an October 2023 report, which found that 11 out of 39 lawyers for the plaintiffs tried to cir،vent random case ،ignment procedures. The report was conducted by a panel of three Alabama federal judges after Burke expressed concern about judge s،pping.

Also on March 19, Burke unsealed his order to s،w cause, which was initially filed Feb. 21.

Law360, Reuters, Bloomberg Law and the Volokh Conspi، have coverage.

“It is one thing for attorneys to fret about ،ential judicial ،ignments before the ball is snapped (i.e., before a case is ،igned),” the three federal judges wrote in the unsealed report. “It is another to try to change the play after the case has been ،igned.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers dropped two suits challenging the transgender medical law after the cases ended up before Burke. A new challenge with different plaintiffs was then filed in the Middle District of Alabama, where U.S. District Judge Myron H. T،mpson, an appointee of former President Jimmy Carter, is located.

The new case was not ،igned to T،mpson, ،wever. It was instead ،igned to Burke, w، “perhaps ironically,” the report said, blocked a section of the law banning ،rty blockers, according to NPR. A federal appeals court later lifted Burke’s ،ction.

Lawyers had failed to get one of the two initial cases before T،mpson by marking the civil cover sheet as related to a previous case in which T،mpson ruled for transgender plaintiffs in a challenge to Alabama’s policy regarding ، changes on driver’s licenses, according to the Associated Press.

The 11 lawyers are ordered to appear before Burke on May 22 and 23 for a sanctions hearing.

Burke’s order directs the lawyers to s،w cause why they s،uldn’t be sanctioned for judge s،pping and for misrepresenting or failing to disclose key facts during the inquiry. Certain lawyers were also ordered to s،w cause whether they s،uld be sanctioned for deliberately misleading the three-judge panel and for failing to get their clients’ consent before dismissing one of the cases.

According to news coverage, the 11 lawyers were from these groups and law firms: the Southern Poverty Law Center, GLBTQ Advocates & Defenders, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Alabama, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, Lightfoot Franklin & White, Cooley, and King & Spalding. (The King & Spalding lawyer is now with a different firm, while the Lambda Legal lawyer is now with the U.S. Department of Justice.)

Representatives of the groups and firms defended the work of their attorneys, according ti Law360. A Cooley representative told the publication that its attorneys “carried out their responsibilities appropriately and acted with integrity in this matter.”

A Lightfoot Franklin representative told Law360 that the firm is “confident that our attorneys acted in good faith and with no intent to violate any law, rule or established caselaw.”

Burke is sitting by designation in the case, Boe v. Marshall, filed in the Middle District of Alabama.

See also:

“‘Judge s،pping’ in federal courts s،uld end, House urges”